<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Adcenter takes a stance on Trademark Terms and Bidding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/2007/08/30/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/2007/08/30/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:47:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/2007/08/30/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Maybe I should have read that email!

Nothing chapped me off more than getting a notification that half my keywords weren&#039;t used because they were &quot;trademarks&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I should have read that email!</p>
<p>Nothing chapped me off more than getting a notification that half my keywords weren&#8217;t used because they were &#8220;trademarks&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Mothner</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/2007/08/30/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mothner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/#comment-591</guid>
		<description>This is certainly good news for affiliate sites. The fact that &quot;Microsoft adCenter will no longer intercede to obtain permission for the advertiser wanting to use a trademarked term&quot; will make affiliate advertising much easier. Although some may be concerned that trademark use will be misused, I don&#039;t think that this will turn into an issue, nor will trademark owners continually need to be submitting forms regarding misuse. I think this is a good move by Microsoft Adwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly good news for affiliate sites. The fact that &#8220;Microsoft adCenter will no longer intercede to obtain permission for the advertiser wanting to use a trademarked term&#8221; will make affiliate advertising much easier. Although some may be concerned that trademark use will be misused, I don&#8217;t think that this will turn into an issue, nor will trademark owners continually need to be submitting forms regarding misuse. I think this is a good move by Microsoft Adwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YearnToEarn</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/2007/08/30/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>YearnToEarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-affiliates.com/microsoft-adcenter-takes-a-stance-on-trademark-terms-and-bidding/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>I just got this email also. Sounds like good news for us publishers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got this email also. Sounds like good news for us publishers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
